Actions
Post info
cosmicrat
Peace, freedom, equality, tolerance, and justice for all
10.02.2018 (9 days ago)
Recommend
 
Post view

UNDERSTANDING IS NOT ENOUGH
by cosmicrat ·
10-February-2018, 9:22 pm

Democrats, and liberals in general, have been accused of ignoring or not understanding the "white working class" and rural Americans.  That is not at all true.  

ALL people, from the middle class to the working poor, urban and rural, regardless of ethnicity, have the same general economic interests.  That is true of all human beings everywhere  Not all of them know or believe that.

As the following article explains the actual problem.  I'm copying most of it below, followed by the link.

Note that the author is not generalizing about all those of a region, class, or status, but describing the significant number of people who think and act as described.

"As the election of Donald Trump is being sorted out, a common theme keeps cropping up from all sides: “Democrats failed to understand white, working-class, fly-over America.”

Trump supporters are saying this. Progressive pundits are saying this. Talking heads across all forms of the media are saying this. Even some Democratic leaders are saying this. It doesn’t matter how many people say it, it is complete BS. It is an intellectual/linguistic sleight of hand meant to draw attention away from the real problem. The real problem isn’t East Coast elites who don’t understand or care about rural America. The real problem is that rural Americans don’t understand the causes of their own situations and fears and they have shown no interest in finding out. They don’t want to know why they feel the way they do or why they are struggling because they don’t want to admit it is in large part because of the choices they’ve made and the horrible things they’ve allowed themselves to believe.

I grew up in rural Christian white America. You’d be hard-pressed to find an area of the country with a higher percentage of Christians or whites. I spent most of the first 24 years of my life deeply embedded in this culture. I religiously (pun intended) attended their Christian services. I worked off and on on their rural farms. I dated their calico-skirted daughters. I camped, hunted and fished with their sons. I listened to their political rants at the local diner and truck stop. I winced at their racist/bigoted jokes and epithets that were said more out of ignorance than animosity. I have watched the town I grew up in go from a robust economy with well-kept homes and infrastructure to a struggling economy with shuttered businesses, dilapidated homes and a broken-down infrastructure over the past 30 years. The problem isn’t that I don’t understand these people. The problem is they don’t understand themselves or the reasons for their anger and frustration.

In deep-red America, the white Christian god is king, figuratively and literally. Religious fundamentalism has shaped most of their belief systems. Systems built on a fundamentalist framework are not conducive to introspection, questioning, learning, or change. When you have a belief system built on fundamentalism, it isn’t open to outside criticism, especially by anyone not a member of your tribe and in a position of power. The problem isn’t that coastal elites don’t understand rural Americans. The problem is that rural America doesn’t understand itself and will never listen to anyone outside its bubble. It doesn’t matter how “understanding” you are, how well you listen, what language you use…if you are viewed as an outsider, your views will be automatically discounted. I’ve had hundreds of discussions with rural white Americans and whenever I present them any information that contradicts their entrenched beliefs, no matter how sound, how unquestionable, how obvious, they will not even entertain the possibility that it might be true. Their refusal is a result of the nature of their fundamentalist belief system and the fact that I’m the enemy because I’m an educated liberal.

At some point during the discussion, they will say, “That’s your education talking,” derogatorily, as a general dismissal of everything I said. They truly believe this is a legitimate response, because to them education is not to be trusted. Education is the enemy of fundamentalism because fundamentalism, by its very nature, is not built on facts. The fundamentalists I grew up around aren’t anti-education. They want their kids to know how to read and write. They are against quality, in-depth, broad, specialized education. Learning is only valued up to a certain point. Once it reaches the level where what you learn contradicts doctrine and fundamentalist arguments, it becomes dangerous. I watched a lot of my fellow students who were smart, stop their education the day they graduated high school. For most of the young ladies, getting married and having kids was more important than continuing their learning. For many of the young men, getting a college education was seen as unnecessary and a waste of time. For the few who did go to college, what they learned was still filtered through their fundamentalist belief systems. If something they were taught didn’t support a preconception, it would be ignored and forgotten the second it was no longer needed to pass an exam.

Knowing this about their belief system and their view of outside information that doesn’t support it, telling me that the problem is coastal elites not understanding them completely misses the point.

Another problem with rural Christian white Americans is they are racists. I’m not talking about white hood-wearing, cross-burning, lynching racists (though some are). I’m talking about people who deep down in their heart of hearts truly believe they are superior because they are white. Their white god made them in his image and everyone else is a less-than-perfect version, flawed and cursed.

The religion in which I was raised taught this. Even though they’ve backtracked on some of their more racist declarations, many still believe the original claims. Non-whites are the color they are because of their sins, or at least the sins of their ancestors. Blacks don’t have dark skin because of where they lived and evolution; they have dark skin because they are cursed. God cursed them for a reason. If god cursed them, treating them as equals would be going against god’s will. It is really easy to justify treating people differently if they are cursed by god and will never be as good as you no matter what they do because of some predetermined status.

Once you have this view, it is easy to lower the outside group’s standing and acceptable level of treatment. Again, there are varying levels of racism at play in rural Christian white America. I know people who are ardent racists. I know a lot more whose racism is much more subtle but nonetheless racist. It wouldn’t take sodium pentothal to get most of these people to admit they believe they are fundamentally better and superior to minorities. They are white supremacists who dress up in white dress shirts, ties and gingham dresses. They carry a bible and tell you, “everyone’s a child of god” but forget to mention that some of god’s children are more favored than others and skin tone is the criterion by which we know who is and isn’t at the top of god’s list of most favored children.

For us “coastal elites” who understand evolution, genetics and science, nothing we say to those in flyover country is going to be listened to because not only are we fighting against an anti-education belief system, we are arguing against god. You aren’t winning a battle of beliefs with these people if you are on one side of the argument and god is on the other. No degree of understanding this is going to suddenly make them less racist, more open to reason and facts. Telling “urban elites” they need to understand rural Americans isn’t going to lead to a damn thing because it misses the causes of the problem.

Because rural Christian white Americans will not listen to educated arguments, supported by facts that go against their fundamentalist belief systems from “outsiders,” any change must come from within. Internal change in these systems does happen, but it happens infrequently and always lags far behind reality. This is why they fear change so much. They aren’t used to it. Of course, it really doesn’t matter whether they like it or not, it, like evolution and climate change even though they don’t believe it, it is going to happen whether they believe in it or not.

Another major problem with closed-off fundamentalist belief systems is they are very susceptible to propaganda. All belief systems are to some extent, but fundamentalist systems even more so because there are no checks and balances. If bad information gets in, it doesn’t get out and because there are no internal mechanisms to guard against it, it usually ends up very damaging to the whole. A closed-off belief system is like spinal fluid—it is great as long as nothing infectious gets into it. If bacteria get into your spinal fluid, it causes unbelievable damage because there are no white blood cells to fend off invaders and protect the system. Without the protective services of white blood cells in the spinal column, infection spreads like wildfire and does significant damage in a short period of time. Once inside the closed-off spinal system, bacteria are free to destroy whatever they want.

The same is true with closed-off belief systems. Without built-in protective functions like critical analysis, self-reflection, openness to counter-evidence, and willingness to re-evaluate any and all beliefs, bad information in a closed-off system ends up doing massive damage in a short period of time. What has happened to too many fundamentalist belief systems is damaging information has been allowed in from people who have been granted “expert status.” If someone is allowed into a closed-off system and their information is deemed acceptable, anything they say will be readily accepted and become gospel.

Rural Christian white Americans have let anti-intellectual, anti-science, bigoted racists like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, the Stepford wives of Fox, and every evangelical preacher on television into their systems because these people tell them what they want to hear and because they sell themselves as being like them. The truth is none of these people give a rat’s ass about rural Christian white Americans except how they can exploit them for attention and money. None of them have anything in common with the people who have let them into their belief systems with the exception that they are white and they speak the language of white superiority.

Gays being allowed to marry are a threat. Blacks protesting the killing of their unarmed friends and family are a threat. Hispanics doing the cheap labor on their farms are somehow viewed a threat. The black president is a threat. Muslims are a threat. The Chinese are a threat. Women wanting to be autonomous are a threat. The college educated are a threat. Godless scientists are a threat. Everyone who isn’t just like them has been sold to them as a threat and they’ve bought it hook, line and grifting sinker. Since there are no self-regulating mechanisms in their belief systems, these threats only grow over time. Since facts and reality don’t matter, nothing you say to them will alter their beliefs. “President Obama was born in Kenya, is a secret member of the Muslim Brotherhood who hates white Americans and is going to take away their guns.” I feel ridiculous even writing this, it is so absurd, but it is gospel across large swaths of rural America. Are rural Christian white Americans scared? Damn right they are. Are their fears rational and justified? Hell no. The problem isn’t understanding their fears. The problem is how to assuage fears based on lies in closed-off fundamentalist belief systems that don’t have the necessary tools for properly evaluating the fears.

I don’t have a good answer to this question. When a child has an irrational fear, you can deal with it because they trust you and are open to possibilities. When someone doesn’t trust you and isn’t open to anything not already accepted as true in their belief system, there really isn’t much, if anything, you can do. This is why I think the idea that “Democrats have to understand and find common ground with rural America,” is misguided and a complete waste of time. When a 2,700-year-old book that was written by uneducated, pre-scientific people, subject to translation innumerable times, and edited with political and economic pressures from popes and kings, is given higher intellectual authority than facts arrived at from a rigorous, self-critical, constantly re-evaluating system that can and does correct mistakes, no amount of understanding, respect or evidence is going to change their minds and assuage their fears.

Do you know what does change the beliefs of fundamentalists, sometimes? When something becomes personal. Many a fundamentalist has changed his mind about the LGBT community once his loved ones started coming out of the closet. Many have not. But those who did, did so because their personal experience came into direct conflict with what they believe.

My father is a good example of this. For years I had long, heated discussions with him about gay rights. Being the good religious fundamentalist he is, he could not even entertain the possibility he was wrong. The church said it was wrong, so therefore it was wrong. No questions asked. No analysis needed. This changed when one of his adored stepchildren came out of the closet. He didn’t do a complete 180. He has a view that tries to accept gay rights while at the same time viewing being gay as a mortal sin because his need to have his belief system be right outweighs everything else.

This isn’t uncommon. Deeply held beliefs are usually only altered, replaced under catastrophic circumstances that are personal. This belief system alteration works both ways. I know diehard, open-minded progressives who became ardent fundamentalists due to a traumatic event in their lives. A good example of this is the comedian Dennis Miller. I’ve seen Miller in concert four different times during the 1990s. His humor was complex, riddled with references and leaned pretty left on almost all issues. Then 9/11 happened. For whatever reasons, the trauma of 9/11 caused a seismic shift in Miller’s belief system. Now he is a mainstay on conservative talk radio. His humor was replaced with anger and frustration. 9/11 changed his belief system because it was a catastrophic event that was personal to him.

The catastrophe of the Great Depression along with FDR’s progressive remedies helped create a generation of Democrats out of previously diehard Republicans. People who had up until that point believed only the free market could help the economy, not the government, changed their minds when the brutal reality of the Great Depression affected them directly and personally.

I thought the financial crisis in 2008 would have a similar, though lesser impact on many Republicans. It didn’t. The systems that were put in place after the Great Recession to deal with economic crises, the quick, smart response by Congress and the administration helped turn what could have been a catastrophic event into merely a really bad one. People suffered, but they didn’t suffer enough to become open to questioning their deeply held beliefs. Because this questioning didn’t take place, the Great Recession didn’t lead to any meaningful political shifts away from poorly regulated markets, supply side economics or how to respond to a financial crisis. This is why, even though rural Christian white Americans were hit hard by the Great Recession, they not only didn’t blame the political party they’ve aligned themselves with for years, they rewarded them two years later by voting them into a record number of state legislatures and taking over the U.S. House.

Of course, it didn’t help matters that there were scapegoats available toward whom they could direct their fears, anger and white supremacy. A significant number of rural Americans believe President Obama was in charge when the financial crisis started. An even higher number believe the mortgage crisis was the result of the government forcing banks to give loans to unqualified minorities. It doesn’t matter how untrue both of these things are, they are gospel in rural America. Why reevaluate your beliefs and voting patterns when scapegoats are available?

How do you make climate change personal to someone who believes only god can alter the weather? How do you make racial equality personal to someone who believes whites are naturally superior to non-whites? How do you make gender equality personal to someone who believes women are supposed to be subservient to men by god’s command? How do you get someone to view minorities as not threatening to people who don’t live around minorities and have never interacted with them? How do you make personal the fact massive tax cuts and cutting back government hurts their economic situation when they’ve voted for such policies for decades? I don’t think you can without some catastrophic events. And maybe not even then. The Civil War was pretty damn catastrophic, yet a large swath of the South believed—and still believes—they were right and had the moral high ground. They were/are also mostly Christian fundamentalists who believe they are superior because of the color of their skin and the religion they profess to follow. There is a pattern here for anyone willing to connect the dots.

“Rural white America needs to be better understood,” is not one of the dots. “Rural white America needs to be better understood,” is a dodge, meant to avoid the real problems because talking about the real problems is viewed as too upsetting, too mean, too arrogant, too elite, too snobbish. Pointing out that Aunt Bea’s views of Mexicans, blacks and gays is bigoted isn’t the thing one does in polite society. Too bad more people don’t think the same about Aunt Bea’s views. It’s the classic, “You’re a racist for calling me a racist,” ploy.

I do think rational arguments are needed, even if they go mostly ignored and ridiculed. I believe in treating people with the respect they’ve earned, but the key point here is “earned.” I’ll gladly sit down with Aunt Bea and have a nice, polite conversation about her beliefs about “the gays, the blacks and the illegals,” and I’ll do so without calling her a bigot and a racist. But this doesn’t mean she isn’t a bigot and a racist, and if I’m asked to describe her beliefs these are the only words that honestly fit. Just because the media, pundits on all sides and some Democratic leaders don’t want to call the actions of many rural white Christian Americans racist and bigoted doesn’t make them not so.

Avoiding the obvious only prolongs getting the necessary treatment. America has always had a race problem. The country was built on racism and bigotry. This didn’t miraculously go away in 1964 with the passage of the Civil Rights Act. It didn’t go away with the election of Barack Obama. If anything, these events pulled back the curtain exposing the dark, racist underbelly of America that white America likes to pretend doesn’t exist because we are the reason it exists. From the white nationalists to the white suburban soccer moms who voted for Donald Trump, to the far-left progressives who didn’t vote at all, racism exists and has once again been legitimized and normalized by white America.

Here are the honest truths that rural Christian white Americans don’t want to accept; until they accept these truths, nothing is going to change:

  • Their economic situation is largely the result of voting for supply-side economic policies that have been the largest redistribution of wealth from the bottom/middle to the top in U.S. history.
  • Immigrants haven’t taken their jobs. If all immigrants, legal or otherwise, were removed from the U.S., our economy would come to a screeching halt and food prices would soar.
  • Immigrants are not responsible for companies moving their plants overseas. The almost exclusively white business owners are responsible, because they care more about their shareholders (who are also mostly white) than about American workers.
  • No one is coming for their guns. All that has been proposed during the entire Obama administration is having better background checks.
  • Gay people getting married is not a threat to their freedom to believe in whatever white god they want to. No one is going to make their church marry gays, have a gay pastor or accept gays for membership.
  • Women having access to birth control doesn’t affect their lives either, especially women they complain about being teenage single mothers.
  • Blacks are not “lazy moochers living off their hard-earned tax dollars” any more than many of their fellow rural neighbors. People in need are people in need. People who can’t find jobs because of their circumstances, a changing economy or outsourcing overseas belong to all races.
  • They get a tremendous amount of help from the government they complain does nothing for them. From the roads and utility grids they use to farm subsidies, crop insurance and commodities protections, they benefit greatly from government assistance. The Farm Bill is one of the largest financial expenditures by the U.S. government. Without government assistance, their lives would be considerably worse.
  • They get the largest share of Food Stamps, Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security.
  • They complain about globalization, yet line up like everyone else to get the latest Apple products. They have no problem buying foreign-made guns, scopes and hunting equipment. They don’t think twice about driving trucks whose engines were made in Canada, tires made in Japan, radios made in Korea, and computer parts made in Malaysia.
  • They use illicit drugs as much as any other group. But when other people do it is a “moral failing” and they should be severely punished, legally. When they do it, it is a “health crisis” that needs sympathy and attention.
  • When jobs dry up for whatever reason, they refuse to relocate but lecture the poor in places like Flint for staying in failing towns.
  • They are quick to judge minorities for being “welfare moochers,” but don’t think twice about cashing their welfare checks every month.
  • They complain about coastal liberals, but taxes from California and New York cover their farm subsidies, help maintain their highways and keep the hospitals in their sparsely populated rural areas open for business.
  • They complain about “the little man being run out of business,” and then turn around and shop at big-box stores.
  • They make sure outsiders are not welcome, deny businesses permits to build, then complain about businesses, plants opening up in less rural areas.
  • Government has not done enough to help them in many cases, but their local and state governments are almost completely Republican and so are their representatives and senators. Instead of holding them accountable, they vote them into office over and over and over again.
  • All the economic policies and ideas that could help rural America belong to the Democratic Party: raising the minimum wage, strengthening unions, spending on infrastructure, renewable energy growth, slowing down the damage done by climate change, and healthcare reform. All of these and more would really help a lot of rural white Americans.

What I understand is that rural Christian white Americans are entrenched in fundamentalist belief systems; don’t trust people outside their tribe; have been force-fed a diet of misinformation and lies for decades; are unwilling to understand their own situations; and truly believe whites are superior to all races. No amount of understanding is going to change these things or what they believe. No amount of niceties will get them to be introspective. No economic policy put forth by someone outside their tribe is going to be listened to no matter how beneficial it would be for them. I understand rural Christian white America all too well. I understand their fears are based on myths and lies. I understand they feel left behind by a world they don’t understand and don’t really care to. They are willing to vote against their own interests if they can be convinced it will make sure minorities are harmed more. Their Christian beliefs and morals are only extended to fellow white Christians. They are the problem with progress and always will be, because their belief systems are constructed against it.

The problem isn’t a lack of understanding by coastal elites. The problem is a lack of understanding of why rural Christian white America believes, votes, behaves the ways it does by rural Christian white America."

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/02/insider-explains-rural-christian-white-america-dark-terrifying-underbelly/?comments=disqus

It should be clear that the philosophy within the original message of Christianity is entirely different from, and opposed to, the kind practiced by most of those that call themselves "fundamentalist" or "evangelical".  The problem with supernatural god-concepts is that they can be so easily misused.

It seems odd that a message that started with the ideas of loving others, even enemies, caring for all in need, and tolerance of those who are different, could evolve into the complete opposite, the same god being claimed to have ordained both.  That god, who continues not to exist, isn't going say what he or she really thinks, so different preachers can safely interpret the silence however they like.

Of course atheists can be ignorant and prejudiced too, they just don't have the excuse of thinking a god told them to be.

--cosmicrat  Feb 10, 2018

Comments
Order by: 
Per page: 
 
  •  viccles2004: 
     

    I am rural white America. But I don't view me as the rural white America you have posted. I don't own a gun, I don't care the color of your skin. I don't care that what your religion is, I don't care if I have a gay neighbor. I don't care if an immigrant is living next to me.

    I do think that there is a generalization of anything and anyone Rural and White is automatically assumed ignorant and a religious zealot with a lynch mob mentality. I didn't vote for Obama, not because he was black, but because I felt he didn't have enough knowledge for the role he would be taking. I was disappointed when Colin Powell refused to run as I felt he had a working knowledge of what it takes to be a leader on a world stage which is expected from the US. I think that became evident with Obama's appointing of Hiliary Clinton as she took on that position during his term of office.

    It's disturbing to me, all of the finger pointing from all sides. It bothers me that I am considered "unenlightened" that I don't know a thing going on in the world today and all of my problems and the world's problems are because I am white, rural, uneducated and have a belief system that others mock and find illogical.

    I find it ironic that today's culture touts the embracing of all religions and races and yet it despises anything related to Christianity. I watched a show awhile back on the science channel (yes we get that out here in the cornfield) about alien life. The individual on that show claimed that the pyramids could not have been made by man alone. That there had to have been help from a superior being. Ancient relics with images surely supported that fact that something from outer space had to have come oh so many years ago to communicate with those people and create the wonders we see today. I had to smile and shake my head. A superior being...God?...create those wonders...miracles? Outerspace...heaven? His scientific mind was saying the same thing a great number of people already believed but call it "religion" and there is a emphatic "NO" from the scientific community. The only difference I could see between the two threads is accountability. With religion there is accountability and a great many people don't want that consciousness of their actions.

    I will agree with you that there are those who are racists, a great many on EVERY side. I will agree with you that there are those who pervert the mainstream with outdated notions. I will agree with you that there are religious zealots out there who try and brainwash others for their own personal gain, the bible will even tell you that to beware of those in sheep's clothing and who are puffed up. I see it in a lot of preachers, black and white.

    I am sad reading parts of your post. That choices people make of their own choosing are judged by others. That person who attended college who chose a wife and family instead of pursing higher learning. That was their choice to make. And at the end of the day having the love and support of others and having a life surrounded by the people you love seems like a nice choice to me. A book and computer and a degree are only objects. There are different kinds of learning that you can't get in  college or by taking a class.

    I try to see both sides of everything. Just because, after viewing of another side, and still not agreeing with another's viewpoint, it doesn't make me ignorant. It doesn't make me racist. I just makes it me ..with an opinion. I've been to college. I didn't get married. I don't farm, but I do play in the dirt. I draw and paint and read and have friends on here from all over the world. I have atheist friends, Christian friends, Hindu friends, friends who are Mormon, Catholic, Protestant. People are people. There is good and bad in everyone. We ALL need to strive to find the good, to be the good in this life we are given. People need to stop finger pointing and complaining about the other. At the end of the day each of us needs to be able to look in the mirror at ourselves.

     
     9 days ago·1 replies1 replies 
    0 points
     
    •  cosmicrat: 
       

      I tried to make it clear that the article was not trying to smear whole regions or all of Christianity.
      The author grew up among some of the people he was writing about. So did I, in the midwest. Nobody I know thinks that all the people in a town, in a church, or even in the same family, think alike or ARE alike. These are only CATEGORIES of people that CONTAIN the people whose attitudes are being discussed.

      The reason for discussing them is that these are the people liberals and Democrats are accused of misunderstanding; not addressing their needs, as if they were entirely different from everyone else.
      They are not so diffferent from their neighbors who voted an entirely different way.

      When a factory closes because the corporation that owns it has found cheaper labor elsewhere, it doesn't matter what race or religion each of the now-unemployed workers belonged to. They all have a problem in common, though they might differ in who or what to blame for it.

      The difference is not always in the amount of education. Not everyone needs a formal degree. It is enough to learn critical thinking-- how to use logic to evaluate information, and an interest in learning throughout life.
      Education is valuable, though. Thomas Jefferson knew that democratic government required informed citizens, to be sustainable. People should have the opportunity to go to college without going into huge debt. That was possible in the 60's and 70's when I graduated, but much less so now.

      Religious belief doesn't have to stifle thinking in general. When it does, it is usually because someone is using it to manipulate followers into their own prejudicial attitudes which have nothing to do with the original purpose. For the rest, it provides motivation to live good lives in peace and harmony with humanity.

      It is ironic that pseudoscientific speculators would find it necessary to resort to extraterrestrials to explain the pyramids. Mormons and Scientologists might like that idea, but it's just another way of saying "I don't know". Speculation and imagination are good, of course, as long as one doesn't jump to conclusions too quickly.

      Regardless of one's background, it should be clear that choosing a national leader by the ability to tell more lies is a bad idea. Almost everyone would say that honesty is an important value, yet in the flurry of "alternate facts" it seems to have been forgotten. I'd like to see it come back into politics, and actual facts become the basis of choice.

       
       8 days ago·1 replies1 replies 
      0 points
       
      •  viccles2004: 
         

        "Regardless of one's background, it should be clear that choosing a national leader by the ability to tell more lies is a bad idea. Almost everyone would say that honesty is an important value, yet in the flurry of "alternate facts" it seems to have been forgotten. I'd like to see it come back into politics, and actual facts become the basis of choice."

        Sadly I don't think we are ever going to get back to that. Politicians tell the voters what they want to hear, whatever they think will get them votes, and will continue the muddy the waters with finger pointing instead of actually coming up with solutions for today's problems.

         
         8 days ago 
        0 points
         
  •  SecretCorners: 
     

    Let me ask this; "How in hell did Obama get elected?"  Was it that people ignored his dark skin and voted tor the white half?  Supposedly all whites are racist so how in hell did Obama get elected not once, but twice?  Answer that.  So let's stop with this bullshit that it was racists whites that got Trump elected.

     
     9 days ago·1 replies1 replies 
    0 points
     
    •  cosmicrat: 
       

      You are again implying that I have said most white people are racist.  I did not.  I have said the opposite, that racists are a shrinking minority.  That doesn't mean they are not a problem.

       
       8 days ago 
      0 points
       
  •  SecretCorners: 
     

    I glanced at it and it is just more anti-white racist propaganda with anti-Christian BS thrown in.  I thought maybe you would actually present something real for a change.

    I thought maybe Democrats would wake up and stop their identity and victim group politics but hey haven't.  What they did during the President's State of the Union speech was disgraceful.  You may not agree with what Trump was saying but you have respect.  If Republicans have done that with Obama they would have all been called racist and they would have cried loud and long against it.

    For the record since it was mention in your BS article, policeman are not targeting Blacks.  I want you to go out and search how many people have been killed by someone punching them.  If an unarmed man or woman continues to advance on an officer after they have been told to stop, they will get their arse shot.

    As for Obama, we do know for a fact he is using a stolen social security number; which is a felony.  You don't know shit as they say.  There is information available but you just brush it off as alt-right conspiracies.  Just like Hillary Clinton when all the women came forward about her rapist husband, Bill.

     
     9 days ago·1 replies1 replies 
    0 points
     
    •  cosmicrat: 
       

      When it comes to "identity" politics, I hear more of it from you than anyone.  You seem obsessed with your white identity.

      I would not have known or cared what your skin color is if you did not bring it up so often, and defend every criticism of white people, whether you know them or not.

       
       8 days ago 
      0 points
       
UNDERSTANDING IS NOT ENOUGH